![mikogo wikipedia mikogo wikipedia](https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/660/cpsprodpb/159A5/production/_106558488_e32be4b6-f339-49f4-9b1d-6bb44c7edb7b.jpg)
Until it does comply, then, seriously, this article - or, at the very least, its last two sections - needs to be removed. he referred to it as "my article," and that misguided attitude may well be at least part of the problem, here) needs to bother to take the time to actually READ the instructions and standards here, and then make sure his article complies. Instead of asking people what needs to be fixed, the author of this Wikipedia article (which is not "his," incidentally. There is, additionally, all manner of other helpful information, examples, etc.
Mikogo wikipedia how to#
Instruction on how to write a proper Wikipedia article is clearly offered right in the new user's own area, and can't be missed when s/he first signs-up. Why are we even having this conversation? None! Mere minimization isn't even close to good enough. The author writes, here, about "minimizing promotion." Are you kidding me? Minimizing? NO promotion, whatsoever, belongs here. The author playing dumb and acting like he doesn't know what is the problem, and only correcting that on which someone thinks to call him, is the kind of disingenuous stuff that marketers do around here, and there needs to be a harsh consequence for it. or, at the very least, have a big Wikipedia-standard notice put at its very top warning that it reads more promotionally than encyclopedically, and that it needs to be fixed or it will be removed.
![mikogo wikipedia mikogo wikipedia](https://i.imgur.com/5SZ3kOS.png)
Written exactly as it is, this article did, indeed, need to be deleted. like language straight from a product's web site.Īnd I cannot believe that anyone around here is teetering on the edge about any of this.
Mikogo wikipedia pro#
those last two sections, "What happens after the trial period" and "Do I need a Pro Version license" read EXACTLY like product advertising. I know the writer likes the product that is the subject of the article, but as an encyclopedic article those last two parts of the article seem almost like a product ad. Harry.Erwin ( talk) 10:55, 23 November 2009 (UTC) Reply I'd like to see a discussion of its security strengths and weaknesses, so far as they are known. Perhaps you have some tips for me or would be willing to assist - would be cool if you could. I'm going to try and place a little more info about Mikogo on the article to minimize promotion. Athaenara ✉ 22:08, 13 November 2009 (UTC) Reply
![mikogo wikipedia mikogo wikipedia](https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Rx56NiCYb1M/UUJQPHNOIuI/AAAAAAAAN4M/HNZANv4_Q_Q/s1600/cheka.jpg)
I also read that the article as criticized for promoting a company. And these citations were not all from Mikogo, but rather I got them from online media publications, such as Macworld. But I added all citations where I got the info. I see that it has been tagged for speedy deletion due to it not being encyclopedic enough.
Mikogo wikipedia software#
I wrote the article about Mikogo because it's software that is a personal favourite and I wanted to get involved with Wikipedia, so I thought I'd share Mikogo.